Saturday, 16 July 2011 13:15
“Tayo bang mga Filipino ay sadyang nilikha ng Panginoon na mangmang, dukha at api? O kaya lang tayo ganito ay dahil hindi pa lamang tayo nabibiyayaan ng isang mabuting pamumuno? (Are we Filipinos created by God as ignorant, wretched and oppressed? Or are we like this because we simply have not been blessed with an enlightened leadership?)”
So our national hero, Dr. Jose Rizal once asked his brother Paciano.
Up until now, I still reflect on that question when I see millions of my country men and women mired in inhuman conditions of poverty, wallowing in mindless chatter, contented with ignorant bliss, numbed to abuse by local and foreign masters. “Along with a growing minority, I refuse to hang my head in shame. I refuse to accept our situation with the resignation of an invalid,” as Rizal put it.
Why have we not been blessed with an enlightened leader who does not betray the people? Why have we not been blessed with leaders who put the people’s interest above their own personal interest? Why is it that we always appear to elect a saint but end up with the devil? Why is it that we elect people who seem to possess the genes of leaders, but end up with leaders who are thieves? Why is it that seemingly kind persons turn into selfish opportunists once given the reins of their respective group? Why is it that the young idealistic activist turns out to be one of the biggest crooks?
This observation cuts across a broad spectrum of Philippine society from the halls of Congress to the pulpit of the different churches; from the classroom to the boardroom; from barracks to newsrooms; from barangays up to the presidential palace by the Pasig River. What could possibly be the reason for this curse like phenomena in our country?
*Failed leadership: is it cultural?
I have been pondering on this issue of failed leadership from two perspectives: culture and character. One of the strongest bonds found in the Filipino culture is the intra-generational bond of a Filipino family. It is accepted as a matter of moral obligation of a family member to take care of their relations including extended clan members. This particular cultural trait is easily observed in the overseas Filipino workers (OFW) community, where millions of Filipinos endure lonely separation away from their loved ones laboring in foreign countries just to support their families.
It is not uncommon in the Filipino culture to see young adults giving up greater opportunities for personal growth for the sake of taking care of their old parents or their young children. It is one of the most noble and admirable traits that characterize the Filipino.
But this very strong “familism” has a terrible effect on society and the country as a whole when it crosses the moral boundary of that obligation, as postulated by Francis Fukuyama in his book “Trust”.
Let us try to illustrate this moral crossing in a typical scenario of a Filipino who is put in a position of influence either in private or public office because of their talent. We may assume this person is of good character: Yet when the situation arises -- as will invariably happen -- that this person is approached by a family member, a relative or a close friend for a favor, particularly one that involves pecuniary interest, this person will be culturally obliged to acquiesce to the request, even if it means breaking the law. Some will agonize more than others, yet many will succumb to the cultural pressure of “familism” even if it means crossing or breaking the law and compromising one’s principles.
In our culture, the worst names a family member can be called are: “Ingrate” (“walang utang na loob”) or “indifferent” (“walang malasakit’) to your own family. This cultural reality is one of the biggest contributing factors in the failure of our country’s leaders so far to curb corruption. For this result in a leadership that caters to the special interest of a few and not for the welfare of the general public.
There are many examples of this leadership defect from Marcos to Arroyo, where family members and cronies became the vanguards of corruption under the sponsorship of the Chief Executive of the Republic. It is a state-sponsored family enterprise at the expense of the citizens. There are religious leaders who treat church collection as a personal, or worse as family funds. There are low-level officials who treat their position as a family franchise to be endowed to their children and next of kin.
*Failed leadership: is it character?
Having gone through one of the most difficult experiences of my life from the hands of the leaders of one of the worst administrations of the Philippine Republic, and based on my readings of past presidencies of our youngish republic, I can draw the conclusion that the failures of our leadership have not been down to a lack of talent or ability nor are they due to a lack of a brilliant mind and vision, but more because of a simple lack of character.
I have often wondered what happens to people with such heroic potential, who when handed power turn into heels. This curiosity has led me to scour literatures on humanities, philosophy, theology and other relevant literature.
Power magnifies character. History is replete with figures who inspire awe and others who are guilty of despicable deeds. If there is one factor that allowed these personalities their place in history, it is being given the power to rule: As Saint Augustine, one of the greatest Saints of the Christian faith once said:
“An honest leadership is a blessing upon the people, while a dishonest leadership is like a curse upon its people.”
*Why would power magnify the leaders’ strength and weakness?
Let us again imagine an upright person with good character and intellectual ability. Left to his or her own device, that person may do well within the small circle of family, friends and acquaintances that have been blessed with his presence. But give this enlightened leader the political power and you magnify his/her enlightenment beyond the immediate circle of family and friends.
It is a natural consequence that the virtuous leader’s enlightened character shall bring forth a great good over the land and the people who live in it. Such leader is truly a blessing to his people.
Similarly, the weakness of such a leader may well be confined within his or her immediate circle of family and friends. But once this leader is handed political power over a country and its resources, this harmful weakness is likewise magnified in a magnitude beyond the limited scope of this leader’s small circle of friends and family. It is again a natural consequence that this leader’s vices will bring forth great evil and suffering upon the land, making such a leader a curse on his people.
A character perspective of a leader. Why put such emphasis on the character of a leader? Because a leader will be confronted with countless situations with different conflicting interests where his grasp of reality will be required; because a leader will be faced with tempting situations from friends and family where his moral ethics will be severely tested; because a leader will be looked upon by the people to inspire them with a vision of a world they cannot even dream of; because a leader will be besieged by enemies and betrayed by friends putting his courage to the test.
A leader’s ability to weigh and balance naturally opposing tendencies such as fear of failure and the courage to pursue a vision is a rare gift that will bring progress to society: A leader’s ability to hold on to an unbending ethics with fidelity in the face of an all-out assault of sensual and material inducements will surely bring a just rule in the land.
I agree with the idea that character is a constant state of finding the balance between the four polarities: a transformative vision, courage to pursue the vision, a firm grasp of reality and an unbending ethics in the midst of worldly reality.
A simple illustration of this idea is the traditional table with four legs. The legs represent transformative vision, courage, a firm grasp of reality and unbending ethics. Take away one leg. The table may still stand balanced on three legs. But the real test happens once a heavy load is put on top: It will collapse from the weight.
Take away vision. You end up with a set of ethical, knowledgeable and courageous people not knowing where to go.
Take away courage. You end up with a set of ethical, knowledgeable and visionary people but afraid to venture out of their comfort zones.
Take away a firm grasp of reality. You end up with a set of ethical, courageous and visionary people not knowing how to do the right things.
Take away unbending ethics. You end up with a set of knowledgeable, courageous and visionary set of people whose primary interest is to amass wealth and ensure their family’s political fortunes to the damnation of the rest of the citizenry.
*The value of pain in building character
Our discussion about character, especially of those who aspire to lead, will not be complete without including pain in the discourse. I sincerely believe that character is molded in the furnace of suffering of a person’s life. Many people will be subjected to different forms of pain, but not all people will respond to pain in similar fashion. How a person responds to adversity brings forth the true character of a person, particularly those in leadership position. Crisis will provide them an opportunity to seize their moment of glory or expose their embarrassing weakness in pretentious blabber of excuses or bitterly passing the blame to others.
The experience of brokenness can be best illustrated by the lives of renowned leaders such as Rizal, Mandela, Mother Teresa, Lincoln, Lee Kwan Yew, Aung San Suu Kyi, Ninoy Aquino and many more. Juxtaposing these leaders with their contemporaries who dared not endure the pain identifies a historical figure that overshadows the rest. Not all these leaders are intellectual gurus, military geniuses, political masters or economic giants. Rather they are people who experienced severe tests and responded with grace that made them inspirational to others.
Are we going to be blessed with a philosopher king, a benevolent dictator or an enlightened leader who will finally build a nation out of the diverse, familistic, regionalistic Filipino people? I leave it to time and to providence to provide us the answer.
It is the hope of that we may develop a new perspective in looking at leadership especially in the context of the failure of numerous Filipino leaders in delivering on the promise of much needed reforms to their respective organizations and progress to the nation.
We need to acknowledge and break out of our own amoral familistic tendencies. We need to learn to say ‘no’ to our family, relatives and close friends when saying ‘yes’ means betraying our oath of duty to our community. May it strengthen us to decline offers of bribes when accepting them means shattering the promise of our youth.
Aspiring leaders among us need to evaluate themselves as they grow in their own journey of service and leadership: They must be the blessing that drives away the curse of failed and corrupt leadership from our land. (The author is an engineer who briefly worked in government and has paid dearly for upholding the truth.Philippine Public Transparency Reporting Project.)
By Rodolfo Noel “Jun” Lozada
- 19/07/2011 10:51 - Breaking up when nothing’s wrong
- 19/07/2011 09:05 - A Time of Pain and Grace
- 18/07/2011 00:00 - AFP modernization program remains an elusive dream
- 18/07/2011 00:00 - Economic indicators are best proof of business confidence in the Aquino administration
- 16/07/2011 13:16 - An acid test for the MILF
- 16/07/2011 13:03 - AMEN Your verse: Rain
- 16/07/2011 13:03 - On Bishops and Pajeros
- 15/07/2011 10:29 - Peace and tolerance
- 15/07/2011 10:25 - Life is School and Problems are the Curriculum
- 14/07/2011 11:44 - 12 Rapid Fire